Tuesday, July 17, 2012

“Fools rush in where angels fear to tread.”

Why are evil people so hated? Because they do evil things?

Not quite, that is what defines why they are evil, not why people should dislike them. Sure, you could exclaim that evil deeds make them inherently negative influence on the society and that negativity is cause enough for all the hate. After all, that’s why the deeds are ‘evil’. But is the negative influence really there?

Since childhood we are taught that they are necessary for creating compelling and wonderful adventures that teach the common values of hope, respect, friendship etc. If it hadn’t been for the witch that locked Rapunzel up in that tower, she probably never would’ve met the prince or had a reason to grow her hair that long. Without Cinderella’s ‘evil’ stepsisters she would’ve remained average – the would have been no reason for magical intervention. Hadn’t Adam and Eve disobeyed, none of the stories in the Bible would have happened. Hell, why do we have those allegedly superawesome superheroes? Besides, do you think big successes like Bill Gates never got bullied at school?

Without anyone to contrast to, there would not be any ‘heroes’. After all, the main characters are usually portrayed as not very ambitious, all they want is to be left alone and not to fall down to the level of the ‘evil’ characters. Without anyone the protagonists would want to be better than, they would be nobodies.

Though there is a snag in the matter: what constitutes an ‘evil’ character or an ‘evil’ deed? For instance, can the Vogons be named the antagonists or is that title reserved for the police or perhaps Mr Prosser? None of them actually did anything ‘evil’ because they were ‘evil’. They only did what they were told, they did their jobs. They were given orders by their respective superiors. While this does not create a problem for the main point that evil people are not all that bad as the cricketmen are undoubtedly evil from the protagonist’s standpoint, it does raise a valid point – evil is subjective.

“One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter.”

For many Americans, all Muslims are evil. For many Muslims, especially those is Afghanistan and Iraq, Americans are evil. Depending on the local society and current status, different viewpoints on people means varying understandings about ‘evil’. Thus, there is no reason to claim that the witch that almost cooked Hansel and Gretel[1] was evil or that she should be disliked for any reason. And that not just because we don’t ‘know’ whether evil people are actually evil or we are simply interpreting them as such for some probably subjective reason that may or may not be a solid and infallible argument for it – it is also because even ‘evil’ is necessary for the existence of ‘good’. Whether that contrast is actually necessary, that is another matter completely. After all, evil characters tend to be something we are supposed to fear. That may be a problem. “Fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to suffering.”

For the browncoats.

2 comments:

  1. I think you are thinking too fiction-centered.
    In real life people are hated because they are dangerous. It is very hard to trust people if you can't be sure if they will kill you the next moment or not. So, hated people are harmful, emotionally or physically.
    I agree that sometimes people take instant dislike of others for almost no reason, but usually this is not the case.
    Fairy tales have evil characters so people can recognize good from bad in real life. This is quite an important thing.
    A.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dangerous people are hated less than feared. That you can see from reality, the past. You may remember this point from 'We do not have a monopoly on the truth' - the powergrabs in the past have been carried out by small groups of people that are allowed to take the positions of power because they were feared. Hate is but a small mouse that cowers at the sight of fear. Besides, the example of Iraq and Afghanistan that I frequently use is hardly a work of fiction. I bring the examples of fiction, of fairy tales, not because I hold that to be the ultimate truth of the world, I bring them because they taught us when we were little. They made sure that we would know that it is 'good' to be an underdog, an ugly duckling that nobody wants, and that it is 'bad' to offer two little kids that got lost in the woods some food in a nice candy house. Little Red Riding Hood taught us that it is 'good' to kill someone in process of killing someone else (the wolf - the granny and protagonist were not dead or wounded in the wolf's stomach) but it is 'bad' to be in the process of killing one's natural prey (for a wolf that is also known as a granny). Not to mention the story about the wolf and seven lambs - that repeats the message that we should not eat (really, that's all the wolf ever wanted) but if there is someone who wants to eat, it is a brilliant idea to kill him in a very painful manner.

      The whole point is that evil is subjective and necessary. Recognizing good and bad in real life is, by far, not an easy task. And that is worth criticizing - fairy tales simplify the situations, they tell the story from a single biased viewpoint. They have evil characters so that we would turn out to be bigots. I do not find that a positive thing, do you?

      And again on the point of 'hating because of dangerousness', you cannot seriously be claiming that you hate every single person you have seen. Everyone is dangerous. And even when you narrow the list by saying 'more dangerous that the average' you are still at a problem - the most dangerous are those you do not deem dangerous. To quote a classic: "It's not the enemy that you see coming that gets you, it's the one you don't." That holds true in the real world, it is the people you trust that can hurt you most. Do you really hate them? And besides, look at how many people hated Steve Jobs. He was of no danger to them, he just led a successful company that once in a while made their competition spit out something innovative and awesome - they forced Microsoft to make the Zune, their MacBook Pros keep making other laptop producers to integrate more powerful hardware, they helped expand the computer market. Hate and danger don't act causatively, they act correlatively.

      I hope this explains the problem, the point, and why you are wrong.
      [K]

      Delete